Metaphysical libertarianism: why determinism must be false
Metaphysical libertarianism is the philosophical position that humans possess genuine free will, which means determinism (the idea that every event is completely fixed by prior causes) is false. It claims that when you make a choice, you genuinely could have chosen differently under the exact same circumstances. This makes you the true originator of your actions rather than a link in an unbroken physical chain.
By the edgi team We find the most surprising true thing about an idea and build a 60-second lesson around it.
Imagine the universe is a giant, precise machine. If every event is strictly caused by a prior event, then your choice of coffee this morning was set in stone billions of years ago.
A close-up view of the intricate brass gears and mechanisms of a clockwork movement. HNH, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
This is determinism: a world where you are just a passenger in your own body, following a script you didn't write.
The break in the chain
Metaphysical libertarianism rejects this script. It argues that for you to be truly free, you must have been able to do otherwise under the exact same conditions.
Aerial view of a Y-junction, or "fork in the road," in a rural setting, with two paved roads diverging. Wikideas1, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
You are not a domino falling in a line; you are an agent capable of starting a new, uncaused chain of events.
The moment of choice
Philosopher Robert Kane proposed that we build our character during what he called Self-Forming Actions. These are high-tension moments where we are torn between two paths, and our choice isn't predetermined by our past.
This view insists you are the true author of your actions, and therefore, the only one responsible for them.
A portrait painting of Antonio Vivaldi, depicted with a white wig and a red robe, holding a violin and a quill pen. Unidentified painter, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
How libertarians explain the break in physical causality
Metaphysical libertarianism divides mainly into physical and non-physical accounts. Non-physical approaches, backed by interactionist dualists, argue that brain events do not have an entirely physical explanation, allowing a non-physical mind or soul to override physical causality. Thinkers like C. S. Lewis proposed that physical indeterminism could provide an entry point for a non-physical entity to act on reality.
This diagram illustrates how metaphysical libertarians attempt to ground human free will in an indeterministic world. Roland Scheicher 20:07, 11. Jan. 2007 (CET), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Naturalistic approaches do not abandon physicalism. Instead, they look to physical indeterminism, such as probabilistic subatomic particle behavior, to provide the necessary openness in nature. Robert Kane describes free volition as a complex process where indeterminism acts as an obstacle or resistance within the will that a person overcomes through effort. Other naturalistic views invoke panpsychism, suggesting a quality of mind exists in all particles across the universe.
Agent causation and the prime mover unmoved
Standard event causation explains occurrences through previous events, like a tree falling because of wind and rot. In contrast, agent-causal theorists like George Berkeley, Thomas Reid, and Roderick Chisholm argue that an acting human is not moved by prior events, states, or desires. Instead, the person acts directly as an agent.
Chisholm described human agents as having the status of a prime mover unmoved. When you act, you cause an event to happen, but nothing causes you to cause it. Critics like William James questioned this view, asking how an agent can be held responsible if an action emerges as a novelty separate from the agent's past character and desires.
Test yourself
In metaphysical libertarianism, does genuine free will require that you could have done otherwise under identical conditions?
Yes, a break in the causal chain is required.. Libertarianism insists that true agency means you are not just a domino reacting to the past, but an uncaused starter of new events.
Does metaphysical libertarianism claim that free will is compatible with a strictly deterministic universe?
False. Libertarianism insists that free will requires a break in the causal chain of the universe, making it fundamentally incompatible with determinism.
Metaphysical libertarianism is the same concept as political libertarianism.
False. While they share a name, metaphysical libertarianism deals with the nature of the will, whereas the political version focuses on individual liberty and government role.
Play the lesson in edgi and the card is yours. It lands on your Map next to the ideas it connects to, and turns from matte to foil to gold as you learn more around it.
William Belsham recorded the first use of the term in 1789. He used it during a debate about free will to oppose determinist and necessitarian views.
Did early philosophers know about quantum indeterminacy?
Early philosophers like John Duns Scotus, René Descartes, and Immanuel Kant did not know about quantum mechanics. Modern libertarians later looked to subatomic indeterminism to explain how the physical world avoids strict determinism.
Did quantum physicists agree that physics enables free will?
Not all of them did. Niels Bohr, one of the founders of quantum theory, suggested that no connection could be made between the indeterminism found in nature and the freedom of the human will.